MSI R9 290 OC Gaming Edition Review (1600p, Ultra HD 4K)

Review Score:
56 Flares 56 Flares ×

AMD’s R9 290 and R9 290X have been well received by the gaming community over the last couple of months, especially those partner cards featuring enhanced coolers and clock speeds. Today we look at a solution that has received special treatment courtesy of MSI … their R9 290 Gaming Edition. How does it stack up?

first page9 MSI R9 290 OC Gaming Edition Review (1600p, Ultra HD 4K)
Today we supplement our tests by analysing performance at 3840×2160 (4k HD) on the Asus PQ321QE. We acquired one of these screens for high end graphics card reviews. Last year this monitor cost £2,999.99, but (as we predicted) the prices are already dropping in 2014 … down to £2399.99 this month. Sure it is still a lot of money, but prices will continue to decrease, opening up the joys of 4K gaming to a wider audience.
image001 MSI R9 290 OC Gaming Edition Review (1600p, Ultra HD 4K)
Setting up this monitor is simple with both AMD and Nvidia hardware (via DisplayPort cable) and we didn’t experience any issues. To achieve a refresh rate of 60hz after the Forceware or Catalyst drivers were installed we enable the Multi Stream Transport mode within a submenu of the Asus PQ321QE.
gpuz10 MSI R9 290 OC Gaming Edition Review (1600p, Ultra HD 4K)
MSI have overclocked their R9 290X from reference speeds of 947mhz to 977mhz although the memory is running at default clock speeds of 1,250mhz (5Gbps effective). The Hawaii core is built on the 28nm process and features 2560 shaders, 64 ROPS and 160 Texture Units. The 4GB of GDDR5 memory is connected via a 512 Bit interface.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 4.6/5 (14 votes cast)
MSI R9 290 OC Gaming Edition Review (1600p, Ultra HD 4K), 4.6 out of 5 based on 14 ratings
56 Flares Google+ 0 Twitter 4 Reddit 0 StumbleUpon 0 Email -- Facebook 52 56 Flares ×

Page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

  • Ian

    Great card, but Sapphire are miles ahead and ive been reading some problems with the fans on these MSI cards long term. failures etc.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -8 (from 8 votes)
  • EsOne

    I have had an MSI twin frozr card for years and never had a problem with it. I think some people don’t clean their fans and coolers fairly regularly and the dust kills them. nothing to do with a bad design.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
  • Wilker

    The 290 is just so much more sensible than the 290x, they are mega money for very little extra gain. AMD dropped the ball with the pricing.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Lewis

    I bought one last week from OC when it was on sale for £330!
    Excellent timing on the review though as now I have an idea of the headroom I have for overclocking.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Martin

    This R9 290 is louder, hotter and has a lower clock speed than the gigabyte R9 290, so why does this have have a higher score?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -1 (from 9 votes)
  • Pingback: MSI R9 290 OC Gaming Edition Review (1600p, Ultra HD 4K) | Bigger Muscles Now

  • Alex4net

    I try to configure that MSI R9 290 card for mining – problem is heat – when you ask for more than 650kH/s temperature is mre that 85 it turn off.
    I find configuration with 840kH/s but iy’s working 7 minutes before turn off.
    Any idea what to do?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -3 (from 3 votes)
  • Phil

    Something interesting , the card is actually mentioned to be over clocked to 1004mhz, but it needs the MSI Gaming App (could use afterburner as well). I wish they just overclocked it to 1004mhz without the need to use that app

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Polls

Which monitor next?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
KitGuru Facebook
Latest News Latest Previews
Related Posts
Archives