The AMD HD6850 1120/960 Shader Debate – comparisons

2 Flares 2 Flares ×

Futuremark released 3DMark Vantage, on April 28, 2008. It is a benchmark based upon DirectX 10, and therefore will only run under Windows Vista (Service Pack 1 is stated as a requirement) and Windows 7.

This is the first edition where the feature-restricted, free of charge version could not be used any number of times. 1280×1024 resolution was used with performance settings.

Our results show a 8.1 percent difference when increasing the unifed shaders from 960 to 1120, a considerable improvement from 12,520 points to 13,541 points.

VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
The AMD HD6850 1120/960 Shader Debate - comparisons, 5.0 out of 5 based on 1 rating
2 Flares Google+ 0 Twitter 2 Reddit 0 StumbleUpon 0 Email -- Facebook 0 2 Flares ×

Page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

16 Comments
  • Tim
    October 24, 2010
    #1
    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Fascinating stuff Zardon. thanks for the info, I feel more educated now ;)

    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tri Color
    October 24, 2010
    #2
    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Excellent, the 960 performance is great, but I can see how the 1120 shaders can enhance the results, thats for sure.

    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Stefan
    October 24, 2010
    #3
    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    I ordered a 6870 on Friday, good reading thanks :)

    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Thomas
    October 24, 2010
    #4
    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    If a few of these get leaked outside review sites they would be worth some money in the future, as a product never released :)

    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Terry
    October 24, 2010
    #5
    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Very interesting, and ive never seen a ‘shader’ based review before. they really do make a difference, depending on the engine.

    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Eric K
    October 24, 2010
    #6
    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    fascinating read, thank you.

    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jon Smyth
    October 24, 2010
    #7
    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    3dmark gets a nice boost of a 1000 points or so, nice.

    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Raymond
    October 24, 2010
    #8
    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Heh, shame they didnt start selling these !

    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Hank
    October 24, 2010
    #9
    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    This is a lesson in shader power and how important it is. would have been awesome if they had sold these in stores for the same price :) a quick OC and its 6870 goodness at less money.

    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Trev
    October 24, 2010
    #10
    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Great to get facts rather than speculation. testing is really useful.

    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Garry
    October 24, 2010
    #11
    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Can AMD hardlock cards from being overclocked? I thought they could. they should have sold t he 6850 at the same price with 1120 shaders, but hardlocked it so it couldnt be overclocked.

    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jerry
    October 24, 2010
    #12
    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Only downside with that Garry is that people would be able to hack the bioses to get the clock speeds up. then they basically could get a 6870 for 140 quid rather than 200. but i like the idea. a locked 775 core 6850 with shader power of 6870 which would be clocked at 900mhz and able to be overclocked. i think they would sell more, but it might stop sales of 6870 long term.

    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • ET
    October 25, 2010
    #13
    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    The Tessmark result is strange. How can you get a 36.8% performance increase with 16.7% more shaders? Must be something else at play.

    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Zardon
    October 25, 2010
    #14
    VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Absolutely – no idea, but ive asked the program author to comment.

    VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Lucifers armpit
    October 25, 2010
    #15
    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Amazes me at times how many sites do little research, I saw one other writer saying kitguru had run tests with a 1120 shader HD6850 in previous reviews. Yet here we are looking at this article and the 960 shader results in this match the sapphire and XFX reviews published last week for the 960 cards. the 1120 cards are clearly much better performers. Thanks for the info, very good read.

    I think the news here on kitguru, while controversial and funny at times tends to damage the amazing quality of the reviews.

    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • CyBorg
    October 26, 2010
    #16
    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Thanks, my HD6850 arrived and my results are much the same as the 960 core version in this article. Bit of a bummer they didn’t let a few 1120 shader versions out into the wild as the differences are quiet noticeable.

    VA:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Leave a Reply:



 

Polls

1080 TV Gaming in the Living Room

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
KitGuru Facebook
*
Latest News Latest Previews
Related Posts
Archives