Home / Component / Graphics / ASUS R9 280X Matrix Platinum Review

ASUS R9 280X Matrix Platinum Review

The tests were performed in a controlled air conditioned room with temperatures maintained at a constant 24c – a comfortable environment for the majority of people reading this.Idle temperatures were measured after sitting at the desktop for 30 minutes.Load measurements were acquired by playing Crysis Warhead for 30 minutes and measuring the peak temperature.

We also have included Furmark results, recording maximum temperatures throughout a 30 minute stress test. All fan settings were left on automatic.
temps
load
Surprising to see such a huge 3 slot cooler not delivering a better result in this test, peaking at 74 degrees when gaming. This rises to 83c in the synthetic Furmark test. By comparison the Vapor X cooler on the Sapphire R9 280x is around 11c cooler under the same conditions.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Intel’s latest Arc graphics driver improves performance in select DX11 games by up to 48%

Intel has been working on improving its Arc graphics drivers since the launch of its …

5 comments

  1. a 3 slot cooler seems insane for basically what is a 7970. I like the card overall, but in crossfire I would have no motherboard visible and the cards would be butting against each other.

  2. I would have bought this one if the price was £280 and it has a two slot cooler. three slot coolers just take up too much room

  3. Zardon, any chance you can throw up the 7970 Matrix Platinum (http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/zardon/asus-matrix-hd7970-platinum-graphics-card-review) up there in tests? Probably the best apples-to-apples comparison over ASUS’ flagship model between these two generations.

  4. Isnt Vapor-X running @ 950 Mhz while the Matrix Platinum running 1100 Mhz. Wouldnt that give a fair bump in the degrees? (enough to justify the 11c higher in gaming)

  5. My bad i see the site ive been looking at only displays base clock at 950, the boost clock is 1070. Nevermind then 🙂