Home / Tech News / Featured Tech Reviews / Zotac GTX 465 Review: Full-on, affordable Fermi?

Zotac GTX 465 Review: Full-on, affordable Fermi?

Far Cry 2 (commonly abbreviated as “FC2 or “fc2″) is an open-ended first-person shooter developed by Ubisoft Montreal and published by Ubisoft. It was released on October 21, 2008 in North America and on October 23, 2008 in Europe and Australia. It was made available on Steam on October 22, 2008. Crytek, the developers of the original game, were not involved in the development of Far Cry 2.

Ubisoft has marketed Far Cry 2 as the true sequel to Far Cry, though the sequel has very few noticeable similarities to the original game. Instead, it features completely new characters and setting, as well as a new style of gameplay that allows the player greater freedom to explore different African landscapes such as deserts, jungles, and savannas. The game takes place in a modern-day East African nation in a state of anarchy and civil war. The player takes control of a mercenary on a lengthy journey to locate and assassinate “The Jackal,” a notorious arms dealer.

Far Cry 2 is still a popular game and the open world environment can be taxing on even the latest hardware available today. We set the game to 8xAA and 16 texture filtering and maxed all the other settings in game (Ultra High).

The GTX465, like most nVidia cards seems to be particularly strong performer with the open world Far Cry 2. Performance is noticeably better at the minimum frame rate area with rates never dipping below 40.

The minimum rate graph is exceptionally impressive with smooth flowing figures throughout our testing area.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Cooler Master launches GPU Shield to monitor 12V-2×6 power connectors

Cooler Master has launched the GPU Shield, a dedicated inline adapter designed to monitor 12V-2x6 power connectors on modern graphics cards and reduce electrical risks.

45 comments

  1. Thats actually a really good card. thanks for the unbiased and impartial results 🙂

    No votes yet.
  2. its still quite hot for a mid range card but compared to the higher end models its pretty cool. Nice performance.

    No votes yet.
  3. 5850 is definiately faster overall but it holds onto it pretty well. if you dont like ATI drivers this is a good option.

    No votes yet.
  4. Interesting results – but the pricing is off. thanks for explaining why though, I will wait for it to drop a little over the next month. my next card!

    No votes yet.
  5. I was expecting the 465GTX to score a little better, but its clearly outclassed by the 5850. That said, for nvidia fans this is a good option, just seems a little too little , too late.

    No votes yet.
  6. Funny text in places, gave me a chuckle. 5850 is a better card which this review verifies but the 465 is better than I thought it was going to be.

    No votes yet.
  7. 260 is too much money for this. 200 quid id be tempted. nothing more.

    No votes yet.
  8. excuse my english – 255 will be how much euros?

    No votes yet.
  9. bit disappointed, thought it would be the class leader

    No votes yet.
  10. drop the price nvidia, get into the real world !

    No votes yet.
  11. good review, informative. it seems to hold its own again the strong AMD competition, noise seems ok, temps a bit hot, but not like 480. all in all a pretty good card, even if its late to the table.

    No votes yet.
  12. better than I expected, nice card. drop the price.

    No votes yet.
  13. I am not really that impressed . it should be beating the 5850, its more expensive, later to market and runs hotter while consuming more power. Why is everyone so positive about this?

    No votes yet.
  14. I agree with long jumper – why is this being received so positively?

    No votes yet.
  15. because ATI drivers suck, thats why. people are prepared to pay a little extra for forceware, its well known 🙂

    No votes yet.
  16. Thats actually quite a good card, nice performer. Temps are still a bit worrying for me to be honest, I don’t have a great case at home.

    No votes yet.
  17. 5850 is still better and actually cheaper, dont know what nvidia are thinking

    No votes yet.
  18. Nice nice nice, I like it. I prefer nvidia cards to ATI and this is next on my list. ill do some shopping around to see if I can get a bit of a deal on one.

    No votes yet.
  19. I was expecting this to be crap, its not bad. still cant believe how hot they get though, thats really poor design methodology from nv

    No votes yet.
  20. surprised kitguru got a sample after all the ermm interesting nvidia news reportage lately.

    Still have to say, good unbiased review. seems to be a capable board. good job,

    No votes yet.
  21. Its pretty close to HD5850, which is good enough for me. ill have one 🙂

    No votes yet.
  22. very nice, thanks

    No votes yet.
  23. too hot for me, i like my cards cold. will wait on third party cooler to come out. hopefully by then the price has dropped also as they cost a bit much right now. good to see why they cost more though in the conclusion.

    No votes yet.
  24. not a flop at all. I bet KitGuru are gutted they couldnt slag it off 😉

    No votes yet.
  25. im impressed with the review, thanks for the coverage so soon.

    No votes yet.
  26. Overpriced, too hot. no thanks.

    No votes yet.
  27. This is a total flop. its far too late and offers no performance improvements over 5850, it actually costs more too ! WTF!

    No votes yet.
  28. wise up NV, almost 90 c under load when overclocked? could double up as a good egg frier. toasty, far too toasty

    No votes yet.
  29. AMD really have this market still in their pocket. If NV drop the price by £30-50 quid then its a different story, but its still AMDs market.

    No votes yet.
  30. You AMD fanbois need to shut up. this is a wicked card, the review shows its actually very close in some and WINS IN OTHERS! I wouldnt touch AMD with a 10 foot pole, cause the drivers such azz.

    No votes yet.
  31. Sam, NVIDIA recently had drivers which bricked cards. I don’t think AMD got to that level.

    No votes yet.
  32. @Vivian: My guess is that it will be almost the same from $ to £ to €

    No votes yet.
  33. 300 euros I hear.

    No votes yet.
  34. Good review – I wouldnt touch ATI cards with a bargepole. last card I had the drivers were absolutely shite

    No votes yet.
  35. The ATI drivers are really good now, I prefer them for watching movies on my tv for instance, the controls work so much better for vibrance, noise reduction and sharpness.

    No votes yet.
  36. You probably just forgot to test power usage, but this card almost takes as much juice as the 470.

    I bet NVIDIA is glad you forgot.

    No votes yet.
  37. I actually didn’t get time to start running power consumption tests however nvidia have rated the card at 200watts against the 470 at 215watts. 480 is 250 watts. Interestingly they say “TDP is a measure of maximum power draw over time in real world applications. It does not represent the maximum power draw in pathological cases such as Furmark.”

    No votes yet.
  38. @Zardon: How does one achieve the proper FurMark anyway ?

    No votes yet.
  39. AMD really have this market still in their pocket. If NV drop the price by £30-50 quid then its a different story, but its still AMDs market.

    Thats actually quite a good card, nice performer. Temps are still a bit worrying for me to be honest, I don’t have a great case at home.

    http://comprarbaratosmoviles.com/moviles-octa-core

    http://movilesbaratoschinos.com/comprar-moviles-chinos

    No votes yet.