Home / Reviews / Crucial T700 2TB SSD Review

Crucial T700 2TB SSD Review

We used CrystalDiskMark 8‘s custom settings to test the Sequential read and write performance of the drive through a range of queue depths. The setup for the tests is listed below.

128KB Sequential Read / Write.

Transfer Request Size: 128KB, Thread(s): 1, Outstanding I/O: 1-32.

In this test, the read performance of the drive accelerates between QDs 1 and 2 before levelling off between QD2 and 8 before climbing again to finish the test run at 12,299MB/s. The write performance races away to peak at 11,437MB/s at QD2 before dropping back between QD's 4 and 8 before climbing again to finish the test run at QD32 with a test result of 11,774MB/s.

128KB Sequential Read v QD compared.

At QDs 1 and 4 the Crucial T700 and Gigabyte's AORUS Gen5 10000 are pretty much on the same pace. However, at QDs 2 and 32, the Crucial drive pulls away.

128KB Sequential Write v QD compared.

It's the same story when it comes to Sequential writes, with not much separating the two Gen 5 drives at QDs 1 and 4 with the Crucial drive pulling away in the other two tested queue depths.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

DLSS 5 NVIDIA

KitGuru Games: DLSS 5 misses the point

It would be hard to argue that NVIDIA’s DLSS technologies haven’t been a net positive to the PC space, with the machine-learning based upscaler successfully translating lower resolution inputs into a final image which is perceivably sharper while hogging fewer resources. Though somewhat more contentious, the next evolution of DLSS came in the form of Frame Generation, using ML in order to generate additional frames for high-refresh rate gaming. Both techniques can have their issues, but generally speaking they’ve allowed for more people to experience higher-end titles at increased frame rates. DLSS 5, however, takes a sharp pivot, with a very different end goal in mind than the performance-boosting versions that came before.