KitGuru KitGuru.net – Tech News | Hardware News | Hardware Reviews | IOS | Mobile | Gaming | Graphics Cards
With sites like TechEye reporting on leaked pricing for the upcoming AMD Bulldozer parts, it seems that Intel is keen to hang onto the enthusiast market space. KitGuru ponders Intel’s next move.
Intel has been in a privileged position for some time. With AMD unable to exert any competitive pressure on processors over the £145 it is charging for the Phenom II X6 1100T, Intel has been able to leave the Core i5 2500k and Core i7 2600k relatively untouched at £165 and £235, respectively, to UK punters.
With initial batches, there can be process issues. However, the longer a production line runs – the greater the efficiency – and the higher you’d expect the yield of ‘perfect chips’ to be. That means you can end up with more working CPUs per wafer. That means you are more profitable.
With the new Bulldozer parts – especially the FX – AMD has the chance to alter that dynamic. By putting competitive parts into the market, above the X6 1100T, everyone’s life gets better.
Unsurprisingly, given Paul Otellini’s love of the music, the Intel pricing machine seems to subscribe to the Bob Marley theory of ‘kill it before it grows’.
Shipping with 8 cores at 3.6GHz, it seems that AMD was aiming to position the new FX processor $15 under the price of Intel’s flagship 2600k. That’s around £10. Which would mean around £220 from UK stores.
So what kind of price cut should we expect from Intel?
If they want to appear completely relaxed and un-stressed about the arrival of the Bulldozer chip, then we reckon they might get away with 10%.
That would put the 2500k at £144 and the 2600k at £207.
If Intel does drop by just 10%, then it will mean the AMD FX processor might need to hit £199 inc vat from UK stores to win.
KitGuru says: Will Intel’s move to pressure AMD actually end up giving the Texan outfit the most attractive price possible and boost sales? Would be an interesting back-fire.
Comment below or in the KitGuru forums.
That is assuming if the performance is similar, and until extensive tests by consumers are out, we will have to take a “wait and see” attitude. If the performance is there, then Intel might feel the need to change their pricing.
i love amd but i dont thank their per core performance is going to come anywhere close to intel’s. and i’m not the only one.
“Insufficient clock-speeds of Bulldozer are probably the reason why AMD now claims that the 16-core offering will be 35% faster than 12-core solution (which is natural, given 33% higher core count) and not 50%, as it initially expected. It is also noteworthy that Bulldozer’s per-core performance is not projected to be much higher compared to existing microprocessors”