Home / Software & Gaming / OpenCritic lets you customise which game scores are aggregated

OpenCritic lets you customise which game scores are aggregated

Amidst all the discussion over the past year about whether game review sites should even use a scoring system for titles, as many consider them too nuanced and incomparable to base it around a single X out of 10, one consensus was reached: that traditional review collating services don't work or are too easily manipulated. The idea behind OpenCritic is to fix that, letting users themselves choose which sites are compared as part of review aggregation, hopefully giving a better understanding of how good a game is.

Games have their own individual pages, with trailers, genre information, publication dates and a break down of their story or main content. Below all of that, the reviews are listed, with author names, previews of the content and links through to the full review. Site users can eliminate certain authors or sites from their aggregations, as well as filter by platform and sort by date/score.

bastion2
The site is clean, easily navigable and has a comfortable, contemporary feel

Some review sites that don't operate on a score scale are featured too, like Kotaku. In those instances, it's simple yes/no metric is used with an excerpt from the review and a link through to the full thing. As well as reviews of individual games, OpenCritic also bundles together its best reviewed titles in a hall of fame, as well as reviews of recent games and a number of upcoming games that are currently in the process of being tested.

Whether people like the style of this sort of site, it's certainly easier to navigate, read and feels much more polished than a lot of other aggregators.

Discuss on our Facebook page, HERE.

KitGuru Says: Do you guys have a few select sites you check for video game reviews? Or do you stick with checking user reviews on Steam?

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Call of Duty COD

KitGuru Games: Predicting the Next Half a Decade of Call of Duty Releases

Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790) famously once said: “The three absolutes in life are death, taxes and a new Call of Duty coming out every single year”. Sure enough, the US founding father has yet to be proven wrong, with Activision and a dozen studios having ensured that come the tail-end of any given year, there will be a new COD ready to release. And so, what can we expect from the franchise later this year? What about 2027, 2028 or even 2030? By looking back at the past two decades of Call of Duty games, their trends, progression and regression, I believe I can predict the next 5 years worth of annual COD entries.

2 comments

  1. I use steam reviews, PC Gamer, TotalBiscuits’ WTF and Port Report videos. Occasionally I will read a site that has made headlines about a particular review (usually giving terrible scores for good games – IGN 6.5/10 for Heroes of the Storm for example) so I can get an extreme contrast of opinions. I never use metacritc ever as the user review section is filled with either strict fanboys or score saboteurs so cannot be trusted in the slightest. I also never read console biased sites like Gamespot or VG247 due to me being a primarily PC gamer.

    I will give this new site a try for a few weeks to see how it handles the mob.

  2. Steam is not particulary useful, the rating system doesn’t encourage reviews that contradict popular opinion. If you argue well for a negative score for a game that is considered good or vice versa, you’ll get a lot of bad ratings. The result is a massive bias.

    Professional reviews aren’t a lot better. But just find someone you trust, and read their reviews. It’s what I do.