Home / Software & Gaming / This publisher wants to foot the bill for indies going through Steam Direct

This publisher wants to foot the bill for indies going through Steam Direct

Last week, Valve announced that it would be killing off Steam Greenlight later this year and replacing it with a new service called Steam Direct. This would remove the ‘community' aspect of Greenlight and just allow developers to list their games on Steam after paying an application fee, which could end up alienating some small time developers. Fortunately, it looks like at least one games publisher wants to step in and help front the Steam Direct cost for smaller studios.

This week, Swedish publisher Raw Fury put out its own opinion on the Steam Direct proposal, which could cost developers anywhere between $100 to $5000 to get their game listed on Steam. In short, if the Direct fee ends up being in the thousands of dollar range, there will be games made by talented developers not making it to Steam.

In the event that an indie developer can't afford the Steam Direct application fee, Raw Fury has said that it will pay the fee for them without taking a stake in the game, though if a game is successful enough then they may want the application money back so that they can continue funding other developer applications.

It is a noble offer indeed but obviously, Raw Fury can only help so many studios, so there is a worry that the publisher will be overwhelmed by requests. On top of that, Valve hasn't worked out all the details for Steam Direct yet, so an offer like this may not end up being necessary at all.

KitGuru Says: The offer here is nice but realistically, one publisher wouldn't be able to front the application costs for every indie developer looking to get onto Steam. Still, hopefully this prompts some additional thought over at Valve when it comes to the Direct system. Perhaps application fees should be more flexible depending on the developer's situation, rather than having a blanket fee for everyone. 

Become a Patron!

Check Also

DLSS 5 NVIDIA

KitGuru Games: DLSS 5 misses the point

It would be hard to argue that NVIDIA’s DLSS technologies haven’t been a net positive to the PC space, with the machine-learning based upscaler successfully translating lower resolution inputs into a final image which is perceivably sharper while hogging fewer resources. Though somewhat more contentious, the next evolution of DLSS came in the form of Frame Generation, using ML in order to generate additional frames for high-refresh rate gaming. Both techniques can have their issues, but generally speaking they’ve allowed for more people to experience higher-end titles at increased frame rates. DLSS 5, however, takes a sharp pivot, with a very different end goal in mind than the performance-boosting versions that came before.