Home / Component / CPU / AMD Ryzen 9 7950X & Ryzen 7 7700X ‘Zen 4’ Review

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X & Ryzen 7 7700X ‘Zen 4’ Review

We wanted to look at a clock-for-clock comparison to make a quick assessment on the Zen 4 architectural performance versus Zen 3. As such, we glued both 16-core chips – the Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 9 5950X – to 4.45GHz and ran a few benchmarks.

7-Zip compression was particularly favourable towards the new 16-core part with a 23% relative performance lead, but this will have also been skewed heavily by higher-bandwidth DDR5 memory.

7-Zip decompression was far less favourable and doesn’t seem to put forth a particularly high uptick for Zen 4.

Rendering seldom places significant emphasis on memory bandwidth in Blender. As such, the 18% clock-for-clock performance lead observed by the new 16-core processor is a pretty reasonable depiction of the Zen 4 vs Zen 3 improvements.

And Cinebench R23 nT with a 12% increase emphasises this Zen 4 vs Zen 3 comparison further.

The clock-for-clock comparison between Zen 3 and Zen 4 is interesting. Clearly, new, high-bandwidth DDR5 memory skews the results a little. But our testing does indicate that the new Ryzen 9 7950X is double-digit percentage points better than the Ryzen 9 5950X it replaces in tasks such as multi-core rendering.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Thermal Grizzly launches affordable Mycro Pro CPU blocks for AMD and Intel

Thermal Grizzly is expanding its liquid cooling line‑up again, this time with two new CPU water blocks. The Mycro Pro Stainless Steel series is now available for both AMD AM4/AM5 and Intel LGA1700/1851/1954 sockets, offering a more affordable option thanks to an unplated copper cold plate and simplified construction.