AMD RX 6900 XT Review

1. Introduction2. AMD RX 6900 XT3. Testing Methodology4. 3DMark Fire Strike & Time Spy5. 3DMark DirectX Raytracing6. Borderlands 37. Control8. Death Stranding9. The Division 210. F1 202011. Far Cry New Dawn12. Gears 513. Ghost Recon: Breakpoint14. Metro Exodus15. Middle Earth: Shadow of War16. Red Dead Redemption 217. Shadow of the Tomb Raider18. Total War Saga: Troy19. Watch Dogs: Legion20. Performance Summary (14 Game Average)21. Cost Per Frame Analysis22. Ray Tracing - Control23. Ray Tracing - Shadow of the Tomb Raider24. Ray Tracing - Watch Dogs: Legion25. Productivity Benchmarks26. Clock Speed27. Temperatures28. Acoustics29. Noise-Normalised Temperatures30. Power Consumption31. Performance Per Watt32. Overclocking33. Closing Thoughts34. View All Pages

Using the average frame rate data presented on the previous page, here we look at the cost per frame using the UK MSRP launch prices for each GPU.

Let’s look at the cost per frame then, based on the UK MSRP of £900. Starting with the 1440p data, the RX 6900 XT comes in at £6.67 per frame, so it is significantly better value than the RTX 3090, being 34% cheaper per frame. Compared to the RTX 3080 however, it is 33% more expensive per frame.

As for the 4K data, we see a cost of £11.11 per frame. Again, this is a hefty saving of 32% per frame compared to the RTX 3090, but it’s the RTX 3080 causing problems as the 6900 XT is 34% more expensive per frame.

Become a Patron!