Home / Tech News / Featured Announcement / ASUS GTX 760 MARS Review (1600p, Ultra HD 4k)

ASUS GTX 760 MARS Review (1600p, Ultra HD 4k)

Unigine provides an interesting way to test hardware. It can be easily adapted to various projects due to its elaborated software design and flexible toolset.

A lot of their customers claim that they have never seen such extremely-effective code, which is so easy to understand.

Heaven Benchmark is a DirectX 11 GPU benchmark based on advanced Unigine engine from Unigine Corp. It reveals the enchanting magic of floating islands with a tiny village hidden in the cloudy skies. Interactive mode provides emerging experience of exploring the intricate world of steampunk.

Efficient and well-architected framework makes Unigine highly scalable:

  • Multiple API (DirectX 9 / DirectX 10 / DirectX 11 / OpenGL) render
  • Cross-platform: MS Windows (XP, Vista, Windows 7) / Linux
  • Full support of 32bit and 64bit systems
  • Multicore CPU support
  • Little / big endian support (ready for game consoles)
  • Powerful C++ API
  • Comprehensive performance profiling system
  • Flexible XML-based data structures

heaven setts
We use the settings shown above at 2560×1600.
unigine heaven
heaven 2013-11-18 12-02-26-98
The Nvidia GTX Titan, MSI GTX780 Lightning and Nvidia GTX780 Ti take the top positions in our performance graph, just ahead of the Asus GTX760 MARS. We also noticed a couple of areas of microstutter in this benchmark that caused the GTX760 MARS to drop below 25 frames per second.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Halo UE5

343 Industries is no more, Halo moves to Unreal Engine 5

There has been a big shake-up behind the scenes at Microsoft for Halo. After the Slipstream engine proved to be a failure that hampered the development of Halo Infinite, future titles will be developed with Unreal Engine 5. On top of that, 343 Industries is now known as Halo Studios. 

7 comments

  1. This is very impressive. always liked the GTX760 for the power to performance ratio. nice job.

  2. Very interesting, I always thought MARS cards were priced intentionally well outside the realms of normal solutions, but ASUS are making this one practical as well.

    Its a good idea, but it should maybe have a different name, not MARS.

  3. Very nice idea, I see a lot of people complaining that it is no longer a ‘MARS’ card, but they weren’t practical at all for anyone, over the top pricing etc. Maybe asus want this one to sell well, and it should actually as its a decent saving over the 780 TI, and closely matched.

  4. Why there is no comparison of gtx690, amd7990, or some SLI/crossfire?
    The Chart is not complete without these comparison….