We used a calibrated meter to measure the power at the wall. No monitors were factored into the readings. The system power drain was measured in the following states:Idle: when resting at the desktop.
Gaming Load: 3Dmark 11 ‘combined test’.



Power consumption is close to what we have seen in the past from a similarly specified, overclocked system. It consumes 100 watts when idle and 328 watts under gaming load.
Tags Cyberpower Infinity Fusion Titan SE Cyberpower Infinity Fusion Titan SE review Cyberpower Infinity Fusion Titan SE System Cyberpower Infinity Fusion Titan SE System Review Cyberpower Titan GTX System review Review
Check Also
KitGuru Games: DLSS 5 misses the point
It would be hard to argue that NVIDIA’s DLSS technologies haven’t been a net positive to the PC space, with the machine-learning based upscaler successfully translating lower resolution inputs into a final image which is perceivably sharper while hogging fewer resources. Though somewhat more contentious, the next evolution of DLSS came in the form of Frame Generation, using ML in order to generate additional frames for high-refresh rate gaming. Both techniques can have their issues, but generally speaking they’ve allowed for more people to experience higher-end titles at increased frame rates. DLSS 5, however, takes a sharp pivot, with a very different end goal in mind than the performance-boosting versions that came before.
KitGuru KitGuru.net – Tech News | Hardware News | Hardware Reviews | IOS | Mobile | Gaming | Graphics Cards


Excellent system, I like it – but I agree Core i7 witith Titan
I have a cyberpower system and it has given me a bit of problems in the last year. my fault though I think as I tried to change the video card and damaged a slot. good built though and nice support
seems like a good deal to me – although id rather build my own and save a few hundred quid overall
Correction maybe? 3570k is an i5 processor, not an i7 processor
chris sucks dick
i agree
massive cock