Home / Component / CPU / Intel preps launch of 665, 655, 665, no 655

Intel preps launch of 665, 655, 665, no 655

Everyone is waiting for the totally unlocked and unleashed i7-875k and a similarly unlocked i5 processor, but they can't seem to decide what to call it.

Products launch in a blaze of publicity and, budget permitting, a ton of marketing spend. Normally though, one thing would be clear, sharp and consistent.

The name of the product.

It's kind of important. When you look at reviews, adverts and information on a company's web site, it's nice when they use the same name throughout.

Those of you who follow KitGuru closely, will have noticed that we've had to re-edit all our strories on the new ‘Special k' i5 product, because the name kept changing. Even days it is the 665, odd days it is the 655 and twice a month we call it the 675.

This is the last time we'll be confused, because, with 100% certainty, it will be solved by bedtime tonight – or one unlucky marketing VP will be getting no supper. The marketing material sent to market includes 665k and 655k branding for one, single product.

KitGuru says: Now that can't be right – unless the HT section has its own name/personality!  Come on Intel, please confirm your chosen number.

Discuss in our forums over here, or just leave a quick comment below.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Rumour points to new 8P/8E Raptor Lake refresh extending the LGA1700 platform

Intel may be preparing to move on from the Core i5‑14600K with a refreshed Raptor Lake CPU featuring an eight P‑core and eight E‑core configuration. According to a new rumour, the updated chip would continue the LGA1700 platform while offering a modest bump in core count over the current 14600K.

7 comments

  1. Ding Dong Round 5

    Clearly they need more interpersonal communications !

    No votes yet.
  2. lol, hey even billion dollar companies fuck things up at times. funny

    No votes yet.
  3. Many companies mess up naming really – nvidia did it with their cards for ages, numbers didnt relate to the ranges etc. sometimes lower numbers were better etc.

    No votes yet.
  4. I vote for 655 – why? just sounds better :p

    No votes yet.
  5. Far too many CPUS in the range, thats the problem. tighten it up and lower prices

    No votes yet.
  6. Sounds like another processor no one needs, right?

    No votes yet.
  7. Foreskinforall

    Just shows the confusion that must go on when you have hundreds and thousands of employees. the left hand doesnt know what the right is doing

    No votes yet.