Home / Component / CPU / Intel Core i7 2600K and Core i5 2500K review

Intel Core i7 2600K and Core i5 2500K review

Now we have seen the basic performance of the Core i7-2600k processor, we wanted to compare it against the 3.06ghz Intel i7 950 processor. This is a similar four core design (with HT) and has been a big seller for Intel in the past, thanks to the excellent overclocking capabilities. This page concentrates on both processors at ‘out of the box' settings.

The new i7 technology is certainly showing benefits. Later we will overclock the 950 to match the 3.4ghz clock speeds of the 2600k.

28% more rendering performance from the new 2600k when compared to the Core i7 950 of the last generation. Significant improvements.

Over 26 percent faster when encoding video, saving around 3 minutes time.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

AMD Zen 6 CPU architecture may include new optimisations to tackle game stutter

AMD's upcoming consumer "Zen 6" processors will reportedly improve 1% lows and reduce in-game stuttering through per-core software and hardware management features. Details shared by Hydra OC developer 1usmus indicate that the microarchitecture incorporates updated Collaborative Processors Performance Control (CPPC) mechanisms alongside memory bandwidth enforcement tools.

14 comments

  1. Wow, those are mega processors. have to get me one

    No votes yet.
  2. Great article and they really are good improvements. poor amd 🙁

    No votes yet.
  3. These are certainly impressive, especially considering the price points they have achieved, which I certainlyw asnt expecting.

    No votes yet.
  4. Compared to the last generation they have certainly delivered much faster processors. I wasnt expecting such huge gains

    No votes yet.
  5. That ASRock fatal1ty board looks stunning doesnt it ? Very impressive overall platform from everyone involved.

    No votes yet.
  6. Thumbs up from me. waiting in line like everyone else for my chip now 🙂

    No votes yet.
  7. Those intel boards are really nice designs, they seem to getting better and better as the years and releases continue.

    No votes yet.
  8. Well I had almost bought a 1100T from AMd, and now I really don’t know what to do 🙁 these are so damn good and the price points are excellent. the 1100T costs around the same as the 2600K and it wont really go past 4.3ghz.

    No votes yet.
  9. There is a clear reason Intel are market leaders, and this is a good showcase of why.

    No votes yet.
  10. Excellent, count me in when I get the funds up.

    No votes yet.
  11. AMD need to answer this with something good in 2011, but I am not sure they can anymore. I remember the good old days of FX processors when they led the way. whatever happened 🙁

    No votes yet.
  12. not that much faster than the 2010 core cpu’s people who say they are are complete idiots on avg perormance increase is about 10%

    No votes yet.
  13. Francis, you’re completely wrong, it’s not that much faster at all, it’s anywhere between -5( meaning slower) to +10 as john already stated

    No votes yet.