Home / Component / CPU / Intel Core i7 2600K and Core i5 2500K review

Intel Core i7 2600K and Core i5 2500K review

ASRock sent us their P67 Extreme4 motherboard, and we used it for a substantial portion of our 2500k testing today, it proved to be both stable and feature packed. A new beta bios was sent to us a short while before the review.

The bundle is fully loaded with four high quality SATA cables, SLI connector, USB 3.0 front mounted header. Literature, manual and software/driver disc.

The board is populated with DuraCap and 1005 Japan made high quality Conductive Polymer Capacitors which give up to a 2.5 longer life – it is also a V8+2 Power Phase Design. The board also fully supports the unlocked K series processors. The Extreme4 delivers support for memory up to DDR3-2133mhz via overclocking profiles and a Debug LED is included on the board for diagnosis support.

There is full support for ATI CrossfireX, up to a Quad configuration. nVidia SLI is also supported, up to a Quad configuration.

The board supports dual USB 3.0 both front and rear with four Sata 3 connectors and 1 eSATA 3 connector, with 2 x IEEE 1394 ports.

7.1 CH HD audio with Content Protection is offered via the RealTek ALC892 Audio Codec with full THX TruStudio Pro also available. Board design is very good with 90 degree mounted SATA cables and nothing blocking any of the PCI slots. We were also able to fit the oversized Noctua NH D14 cooler without any issues around the CPU socket.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

AMD Zen 6 CPU architecture may include new optimisations to tackle game stutter

AMD's upcoming consumer "Zen 6" processors will reportedly improve 1% lows and reduce in-game stuttering through per-core software and hardware management features. Details shared by Hydra OC developer 1usmus indicate that the microarchitecture incorporates updated Collaborative Processors Performance Control (CPPC) mechanisms alongside memory bandwidth enforcement tools.

14 comments

  1. Wow, those are mega processors. have to get me one

    No votes yet.
  2. Great article and they really are good improvements. poor amd 🙁

    No votes yet.
  3. These are certainly impressive, especially considering the price points they have achieved, which I certainlyw asnt expecting.

    No votes yet.
  4. Compared to the last generation they have certainly delivered much faster processors. I wasnt expecting such huge gains

    No votes yet.
  5. That ASRock fatal1ty board looks stunning doesnt it ? Very impressive overall platform from everyone involved.

    No votes yet.
  6. Thumbs up from me. waiting in line like everyone else for my chip now 🙂

    No votes yet.
  7. Those intel boards are really nice designs, they seem to getting better and better as the years and releases continue.

    No votes yet.
  8. Well I had almost bought a 1100T from AMd, and now I really don’t know what to do 🙁 these are so damn good and the price points are excellent. the 1100T costs around the same as the 2600K and it wont really go past 4.3ghz.

    No votes yet.
  9. There is a clear reason Intel are market leaders, and this is a good showcase of why.

    No votes yet.
  10. Excellent, count me in when I get the funds up.

    No votes yet.
  11. AMD need to answer this with something good in 2011, but I am not sure they can anymore. I remember the good old days of FX processors when they led the way. whatever happened 🙁

    No votes yet.
  12. not that much faster than the 2010 core cpu’s people who say they are are complete idiots on avg perormance increase is about 10%

    No votes yet.
  13. Francis, you’re completely wrong, it’s not that much faster at all, it’s anywhere between -5( meaning slower) to +10 as john already stated

    No votes yet.