We are measuring power drain at the wall, excluding the monitor and focusing just on the system. For load tests, we run Cinebench R11.5 64 bit.
Power efficiency is good, but slightly worse than the Core i7 2600k, both when idle and when at full load. The FX8150 leads the pack here, in the test it actually won't want to lead!
Tags ASrock Extreme4-M ASrock Extreme4-M review Intel Core i7 3820 Intel Core i7 3820 and ASrock Extreme 4m review Intel Core i7 3820 and ASrock Extreme4-M review Intel Core i7 3820 review news Review
You may have already seen our review of the new Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus CPUs HERE, in which case you have already seen a moment from our interview with Robert Hallock, VP/GM Enthusiast Channel Business at Intel. The time has come to grab a long drink and settle back for the whole conversation and we guarantee you will learn plenty about Intel's plans in 2026 and beyond...
KitGuru KitGuru.net – Tech News | Hardware News | Hardware Reviews | IOS | Mobile | Gaming | Graphics Cards
Nice CPU, but im happy with my 2500k. hope it lasts at least another year with the games I play !
Very nice indeed. I like the asrock board, most of the p67 micro atx boards sucked
Interesting to see them releasing a CPU at the same price as the 2600k for the X79 platform. Wasnt expecting that.
It looks like the Cyberlink MediaEspresso tests didn’t use Intel Quick Sync Video on the Intel Core i5 2500K or Core i7 2600K/2700K systems. Those processors would appear higher up the table if that was enabled and used.
Well l have the asrock extreme 4 m with 16 gb trip memory with 2xssd two hard drives all in raid 0 with 6600it x2 fps battlefield 148fps 17_3820 CPU ut very fast it for sale
07592340571 paul