KitGuru KitGuru.net – Tech News | Hardware News | Hardware Reviews | IOS | Mobile | Gaming | Graphics Cards

Home / Tech News / Featured Tech News / Hynix SH920/910A 128GB SSD review

Hynix SH920/910A 128GB SSD review

Bill Smyth August 6, 2014 Featured Tech News, SSD Drives

IOMeter is another open source synthetic benchmarking tool which is able to simulate the various loads placed on hard drive and solid state drive technology.

We test with both random read and write 4k tests, as shown above. There are many ways to measure the IOPS performance of a Solid State Drive, so our results will often vary between the manufacturer’s quoted ratings.

The SK hynix SH920/910A scores well in the IOPS 4k random test, and our results are actually very close to the official company claims (94k random read/71k random write). Minor variables are related to different testing methodologies.

Become a Patron!

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Tags 128GB Hynix review 128GB hynix ssd HFS064G32MNB-2200A HFS128G32MNB-2200A HFS256G32MNB-2200A HFS512G32MNB-2200A Hynix memory Hynix SH920 128GB review Hynix SH920 SSD Hynix SH920 SSD review Review

Check Also

KitGuru Games: DLSS 5 misses the point

It would be hard to argue that NVIDIA’s DLSS technologies haven’t been a net positive to the PC space, with the machine-learning based upscaler successfully translating lower resolution inputs into a final image which is perceivably sharper while hogging fewer resources. Though somewhat more contentious, the next evolution of DLSS came in the form of Frame Generation, using ML in order to generate additional frames for high-refresh rate gaming. Both techniques can have their issues, but generally speaking they’ve allowed for more people to experience higher-end titles at increased frame rates. DLSS 5, however, takes a sharp pivot, with a very different end goal in mind than the performance-boosting versions that came before.

2 comments

Mark Graham
February 13, 2015 at 4:25 pm

great upgrade for a lower end laptop.
Ichise
March 4, 2015 at 1:07 am

I just scanned this review 2 times and can’t find a mention of what controller is used in this thing. Is it under that pad in image 4 four or do I need a better microscope? Omitting that major data point makes for a very strange review.