Home / Software & Gaming / More League of Legends pro players banned for being abusive

More League of Legends pro players banned for being abusive

Sports around the world, whether they be based in the real world or online, have trash talking as part of their culture. It's an accepted practice and is annoying when you're on the receiving end, but we don't expect people to be 100 per cent gentlemanly 100 per cent of the time. What it is becoming clear though, is that we expect people not to be abusive, repeatedly and unnecessarily – especially so in Esports.

Riot Games, the creator of League of Legends is leading the way in clamping down on verbal abuse and negative attitudes in professional gaming. It recently banned one pro player, describing him as the most “toxic in North America,” and now it's followed up with two further bans. This makes both Ilyas ‘mouz enVision' Harsema and Damien ‘aAa Linak' Lorthios ineligible to play in the entirety of Season 3 of the League, as well as having all of their accounts permanently banned, invalidating all in-game progress and unlocks.

Banned
Lorthios (left) and Hartsema (right).

Often times gamers stand up against such bans, suggesting that if people don't like the trash talking they shouldn't be playing in a competitive game. However when you look at some of the statistics published by Riot, you begin to understand why the ban is being upheld. Harsema for example, was reported in nearly a third of all matches – reporting occurs when other players complain about the behaviour of a certain player – which according to Riot is six times the average. He has also been punished 18 times in the past for his behaviour across multiple accounts, five of such instances having occurred in the past two months.

This apparently puts him in the top 0.06 per cent of punished accounts.

Lorthios wasn't much better, being reported in 20 per cent of his games and having one of his alternate accounts permanently banned for offensive language and verbal abuse of other players. Riot also reports that he has behaved similarly outside of the game – whether that is at official events or simply online incidents like on forums, it doesn't say.

KitGuru Says: While you can argue all you like that trash talking is part of a game, Riot, the creator and owner of the whole League of Legends property, repeatedly told these individuals to stop and they defied it. What did they think was going to happen?

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Valorant open beta now live on Xbox Series X/S and PS5

Riot Games has been working away on Valorant for a couple of years now, securing …

5 comments

  1. At the end of the day, League of Legends is a competitive game, yes, but when you’re playing normal games, you’re playing it for fun. There’s nothing worse about that game than people constantly shouting because you didn’t do what they would have done etc. It’s even worse when people are bored of their level 30 accounts and make a new one and then give abuse to the brand new players who aren’t as practiced as they are. It’s a huge problem within the game and stamping it out from the top is the best way to do it.

  2. If they ever played a real world sport, and they trash talked, I’m pretty sure they would have the living hell beaten out of them… Just look at them.

  3. I think its brilliant that Riot are acting in this way and would love to see the whole gaming scene follow their lead! I understand there is always going to be some abuse but there is no reason to allow the few to ruin a game for so many!

    As the poster above said, if they were invovled in real world pro sports it wouldn’t be tolerated at all so why should it be tolerated in games?

  4. “It recently banned one pro player, describing him as the most “toxic in North America,”” I find that offensive to myself. I’m pretty sure IM the most toxic in North America. 3 perma banned accounts and working on more =). I shall strive to be #1.

  5. nah people are b*tches in this game and can’t handle alittle trash talking. Can’t stand the heat get outta the kitchen. Ban petty reporters instead.