Home / Tech News / Featured Tech Reviews / Intel Optane Memory 32GB Review

Intel Optane Memory 32GB Review

First step in setting up the Optane Memory module is to download the driver from Intel’s download center.

It’s then just a matter of following the installation wizard through a couple of steps and a reboot and it’s done.


For a mechanical drive, WD’s 4TB Black drive is a pretty quick disk on its own, but by combining it with Intel’s Optane Memory module, the Sequential read performance of the Black is taken to a whole new level. It rockets from 156MB/s to 1,416MB/s and while the Sequential write performance sees nowhere near the same gains, it does almost double the stand-alone HDD’s score.


The huge performance gains continue when dealing with the small files of everyday use in Crystal Disk Mark’s 4K QD32 test.


At a shallower queue depth, the 4K read/write results are not as dramatic as at a deeper queue depth but it’s still a huge improvement over the standard drive.



The huge boost in performance for the WD Black drive when combined with the Optane Memory module continues when looking at the 4K Random IOPS test. Random reads go from 303 IOPS for the WD Black on its own up to 146,867 IOPS when combined, while Random writes shoot up from 289 IOPS to 66,800 IOPS.

The combined WD Black/Optane Memory module halves the boot time of the WD Black on its own. The time drops from 36 seconds for the HDD drive to 17 seconds for the combination of the two.

Check Also

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X & 1200 (4C4T) CPU Review

AMD is bringing a modern processor with four true cores to market for a little over £100.

  • jt AJ

    LMAO testing 4k results at QD32.. wtf. common kitguru, on page 4, optane module is to accelerate 4k at low QD. tell me that a consumer would run 32 parallel things at once. i understand its not good to be biased and show the bad side, the other side is also true its not good to not test what the thing is intentionally made for, which is to accelerate low QD in 4k vs SSDs

  • Nomen Est Omen

    FFS, Intel was working on this for ages. From a consumer point of view Optane is useless (the enterprise drive which predated this made perfect sense). Honestly, I just don’t understand why PCIe x 2, why 32GB max – there’s plenty enough room on that board for at least 128GB. My gran (and her dog) already have a 512 or a 1TB boot drive. Consumers just don’t notice QD performance. And I’m about to buy an AMD in September. Consumer products that could have been used in various ways, but cannot, make me wander whether Baldrick was cunningly involved in development.

  • ET3D

    The problem with tests of disk caching is that they tend not to reflect real world usage, which is what consumers would care about. I’ve seen it with SSHD, which tends to show speedups over HDD, but when you have them in a real PC that runs tons of stuff at startup, has lots of software and games and media installed, it doesn’t really seem to provide much benefit.

    So the question is, how well does Optane work on an “old” system compared to an SSD for system plus HDD for media/games and compared to just the HDD without caching? That’s what I’d like to know.