Home / Tech News / Featured Tech Reviews / Kingston KC3000 2TB SSD Review

Kingston KC3000 2TB SSD Review

We used CrystalDiskMark 8‘s custom settings to test the Sequential read and write performance of the drive through a range of queue depths. The setup for the tests is listed below.

128KB Sequential Read / Write.
Transfer Request Size: 128KB, Thread(s): 1, Outstanding I/O: 1-32.

In this test, we got a read test result that not only confirmed the maximum Sequential read figure of 7,000MB/s but exceeded by quite some margin at 7,428.56MB/s. The best write result in this test of 6,890.5MB/s is some 109.5MB/s shy of the official maximum of 7,000MB/s.

128KB Sequential Read Performance v QD compared

At a QD of 1, the KC3000 sits in the bottom half of our Sequential read results chart but, as the queue depth deepens, the drive moves up the performance chart until at QD32 it's only beaten by Patriot's Viper VP4300 drive.

128KB Sequential Write Performance v QD compared

In the Sequential write tests, the drive sits in the top half of our results chart at QD's 1 and 2. At QD4 and QD32 it tops the chart at 6,881.03MB/s and 6,890.51MB/s respectively.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

DLSS 5 NVIDIA

KitGuru Games: DLSS 5 misses the point

It would be hard to argue that NVIDIA’s DLSS technologies haven’t been a net positive to the PC space, with the machine-learning based upscaler successfully translating lower resolution inputs into a final image which is perceivably sharper while hogging fewer resources. Though somewhat more contentious, the next evolution of DLSS came in the form of Frame Generation, using ML in order to generate additional frames for high-refresh rate gaming. Both techniques can have their issues, but generally speaking they’ve allowed for more people to experience higher-end titles at increased frame rates. DLSS 5, however, takes a sharp pivot, with a very different end goal in mind than the performance-boosting versions that came before.