Home / Component / Bundles / ASRock M8 Mini-ITX Z87 Barebones System Review

ASRock M8 Mini-ITX Z87 Barebones System Review

To test the ASRock M8, we paired it with an Intel Core i7 4770K processor and 8GB of 1333MHz SO-DIMM memory in a dual channel configuration. We will be outlining the ASRock M8's performance with the Core i7 4770K CPU at its stock frequency of 3.5GHz and standard Turbo Boost settings.

While we could have overclocked the processor, heat quickly became an issue in the M8's confined dimensions. Overclocking a processor installed in ASRock's Mini-ITX system would either require one of the best CPU coolers that fits inside the chassis or a chip with a lower TDP than our 4770K.

We will be comparing the ASRock M8-based system's performance to that of our Z87 test system which is based around the ASRock Z87 OC Formula motherboard. Where possible, we use identical hardware and software on each system so that the results are as comparable as possible.

By default, the ASRock Z87-M8 motherboard allows the 4770K to operate at its default turbo settings. This will give it what seems to be a performance disadvantage against other Z87-based systems whose motherboards use forced-turbo settings for the 4770K.

with-phanteks-cooler

ASRock M8 Test System:

  • Motherboard: ASRock Z87-M8 (ASRock M8).
  • Power Supply: 450W SFX 80 Plus Bronze (ASRock M8).
  • Case: ASRock M8 with 4x 70mm fans.
  • Optical Drive: LITE-ON DC-8A2SH Slim Slot Loading 8x DVD±R/RW (ASRock M8).
  • Processor: Intel Core i7 4770K 3.50GHz.
  • Memory: 8GB (2x 4GB) Komputerbay DDR3 1333MHz CL9 (SO-DIMM).
  • Graphics Card: nVidia GTX 760 2GB.
  • System Drive: 500GB Samsung 840 Series SSD.
  • CPU Cooler: Phanteks PH-TC90LS.
  • Operating System: Windows 7 Professional SP1 64-bit.

Comparison Z87 Test System:

Settings:

  • GeForce 320.49 VGA drivers.
  • Intel 9.4.0.1017 chipset drivers.

Software Suite:

  • 3DMark
  • 3DMark 11
  • PCMark 8
  • Unigine Heaven Benchmark 4.0
  • SiSoft Sandra 2013 SP4
  • Cinebench 11.5 64 bit
  • Super Pi
  • VLC Media Player 2.0.7
  • CyberLink Media Espresso 6.7
  • ATTO
  • Battlefield 3
  • Bioshock Infinite
  • Dirt Showdown
  • Metro 2033
  • Metro: Last Light
  • Sleeping Dogs

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Starfield: Shattered Space launches to middling reviews

Just over a year ago, Bethesda Games Studios released Starfield – a ‘big space game’ which had been ruminating in Todd Howard’s mind for over 25 years. Despite its grand ambitions, the title saw a mixed reaction from fans, though positive critic reviews. Unfortunately, it seems as though Starfield’s first expansion ‘Shattered Space’ has failed to impress players on both sides.

10 comments

  1. I think that is really very cool – its a tad expensive, but I would buy it myself. fancy the idea and the design is great.

    Watercooling anyone? 🙂

  2. I like it – wonder if STEAM OS would go on it well 🙂

  3. I always wondered why other companies like MSI, ASUS etc didn’t do something like this.

    I will tell you this too for free – my ASROCK motherboard is better than my last GB or MSI boards.

  4. Wasnt expecting this – I think a 3570k would be better for temps, not sold on those Haswell cookers.

  5. had me until I saw it was a intel cpu and only a 450 power supply and less than a 120mm fan space i would have liked to put a water pro 2.0 in it

  6. What is the weight of the fully assembled system?
    That is a pretty important factor for a system designed to be carried around fairly frequently.

  7. George, thanks for pointing that out.

    The barebones system’s weight is just under 8kg (according to the packaging specs). With a system built inside the M8, the weight will vary depending on the components installed. For example, the GTX 760, Phanteks PH-TC90LS, and Samsung SSD that we used would probably add 1-2kg to the system. This will vary from system to system, especially if multiple mechanical drives or a bigger CPU (or VGA) cooler are installed.

  8. The Silverstone SG05 is smaller and better in every way for $39

  9. How much did they pay you to post this? Its a joke, maybe for 200-300 it would be reasonable.. >< almost as bad as Google's Nexus Q!!

  10. Reviews are free Felix 🙂
    You raise an interesting question though, when it comes to value.
    Having built a lot of systems around products like the early SG01, we know what issues can be faced with these design restraints.
    If all you look at is the material cost, then you’d never buy anything nicer than a Hyundai – because why pay more than £10,000 for ‘4 wheels and an engine’ – but life is not so simple.
    You really need to see this product in the flesh, and try a build with it, to see all of the advantages – in terms of physical design and aesthetics.
    If you get a chance, try and get your hands on a complete system, then come back and let us know if you still feel the same 🙂