Home / Tech News / Featured Tech Reviews / Viglen Incepta Professional RX (w/ Ryzen 2700 & RX 560)

Viglen Incepta Professional RX (w/ Ryzen 2700 & RX 560)

CINEBENCH R15 is a cross-platform testing suite that measures hardware performance and is the de facto standard benchmarking tool for leading companies and trade journals for conducting real-world hardware performance tests. With the new Release 15, systems with up to 256 threads can be tested.

CINEBENCH is available for both Windows and OS X and is used by almost all hardware manufacturers and trade journals for comparing CPUs and graphics cards.

The second-generation Ryzen CPU in the Viglen may only have a small overclock, but its updated architecture and extra cores saw the Viglen streak ahead of the competition in the Cinebench test.

Its multi-core score of 1,686cb is more than 500 points ahead of the nearest challenger – the CyberPower machine with the overclocked Core i5 processor. The Core i3 chips in the other two rival rigs could only score around 600 points – a full 1,000cb behind the Viglen.

That’s an excellent score, and it bodes well for work. The eight multi-threaded cores have enough power to handle the vast majority of office tasks, from photo and video editing to large databases and design tools.

The Viglen’s Geekbench single-core result of 4,139 is fine – a solid result that’s only beaten by the most powerful and overclocked Intel processors. The real star here is the Geekbench multi-tasking result of 20,228. That’s stunning for a £999 system, and not far off the pace we’d expect from overclocked machines that cost twice as much.

It’s just a shame that Viglen has relied on single-channel memory. The single-threaded bandwidth measurement of 18.57GB/s is good, but it hardly improved in the multi-threaded test. A second stick of memory would have delivered another boost to application performance.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

DLSS 5 NVIDIA

KitGuru Games: DLSS 5 misses the point

It would be hard to argue that NVIDIA’s DLSS technologies haven’t been a net positive to the PC space, with the machine-learning based upscaler successfully translating lower resolution inputs into a final image which is perceivably sharper while hogging fewer resources. Though somewhat more contentious, the next evolution of DLSS came in the form of Frame Generation, using ML in order to generate additional frames for high-refresh rate gaming. Both techniques can have their issues, but generally speaking they’ve allowed for more people to experience higher-end titles at increased frame rates. DLSS 5, however, takes a sharp pivot, with a very different end goal in mind than the performance-boosting versions that came before.