Home / Tech News / Featured Tech News / Gigabyte F2A88XM-DS2 Motherboard Review

Gigabyte F2A88XM-DS2 Motherboard Review

The Gigabyte F2A88XM-DS2 motherboard is a very interesting product, especially when factoring in the modest £47 asking price.

Although Gigabyte have stripped back heavily on features, the F2A88XM-DS2 still delivers fantastic overclocking performance.  We were able to achieve a noteworthy 4.5 GHz final clock speed, which is as good as we have managed with this chip using other, more expensive motherboards.

Gigabyte have chosen to use a black colour scheme which looks great and should fit in nicely with most configurations.  The F2A88XM-DS2 features an unusual form factor which is technically micro-ATX, but it is actually more compact.  This makes it ideal for use in compact cases.

The main drawback of this motherboard for us is the lack of an HDMI port.  With an HDMI connector, it would make a great option for those looking to build a basic home theatre PC or multimedia PC.  Gigabyte have also cut back on the other I/O connections, although these aren't likely to be as problematic for most people.

At a price of £47 from Overclockers UK and £46.99 from YOYOTech, we feel that the Gigabyte F2A88XM-DS2 offers great value for money.  It is ideal for those users looking to build a basic multimedia PC on a budget. In fact, if it featured an HDMI connection it would achieve our most coveted ‘Must Have' award.

Discuss on our Facebook page, over HERE.

Pros:

  • Great value.
  • Black colour scheme.
  • Impressive overclocking performance.

Cons:

  • No HDMI connection.

KitGuru says: An impressive motherboard with surprisingly good overclocking capabilities. At £47 it proves difficult to ignore.

WORTH-BUYING-300x300

Become a Patron!

Rating: 8.5.

Check Also

DLSS 5 NVIDIA

KitGuru Games: DLSS 5 misses the point

It would be hard to argue that NVIDIA’s DLSS technologies haven’t been a net positive to the PC space, with the machine-learning based upscaler successfully translating lower resolution inputs into a final image which is perceivably sharper while hogging fewer resources. Though somewhat more contentious, the next evolution of DLSS came in the form of Frame Generation, using ML in order to generate additional frames for high-refresh rate gaming. Both techniques can have their issues, but generally speaking they’ve allowed for more people to experience higher-end titles at increased frame rates. DLSS 5, however, takes a sharp pivot, with a very different end goal in mind than the performance-boosting versions that came before.

One comment

  1. tu data jest coś nie tak 12.14.2014