Home / Tech News / Featured Announcement / ThunderX3 TM50 By Aerocool Mouse Review (w/ TMP40 Mousemat)

ThunderX3 TM50 By Aerocool Mouse Review (w/ TMP40 Mousemat)

Rating: 9.0.

In an increasingly saturated peripheral market, it can be hard for a new manufacturer to stand out and get some attention. ThunderX3, a subsidiary of Aerocool, are hoping that their TM50 mouse – complete with an Avago 3310 optical sensor, RGB lighting and an aluminium base – will be able to compete with established brands like Corsair and Razer. The TM50 may sound like a fairly typical mouse on paper, but ThunderX3 do have a trick up their sleeve – the mouse costs just £29.90.

For the features on offer, £29.90 looks like a great price for the ThunderX3 TM50. Most flagship mice cost at least £50 – just look at the TT eSports Level 10M Advanced, the Corsair M65 Pro and the Razer Diamondback Chroma. In most cases we would actually consider a mouse priced at £30 to be a ‘budget offering', but considering the on-paper specifications of the TM50 we find it hard to call it a ‘budget' mouse. In this review we will be looking to see if any compromises have been made to achieve this low price-point, or if the TM50 is really as good as it looks.

main1

Specifications

  • Sensor: AVAGO-3310 Optical Gaming Sensor
  • Resolution: 1500 / 3000 / 6000 / 10000 DPI
  • Processor: 32-bit
  • Game Type: FPS / MMORPG /MOBA / RTS
  • Polling Rate: 1000Hz / 1ms
  • On-board Memory: 512KB
  • Material: ABS
  • Software: ThunderX3 System
  • Programmable Buttons: 6
  • Switches: OMRON Gaming Switch
  • LED Backlight: 16.8 Million Colours
  • Frame Rate: 6400 FPS
  • Maximum Tracking: Speed 60 IPS
  • Maximum Acceleration: 20G
  • Interface: Gold-plated USB Plug
  • Cable Length: 1.8m Braided
  • Dimensions: 125(L) x 78(W) x 38(H) mm
  • Weight: 175g ± 5g

Become a Patron!

Check Also

The ESA claims private servers for Minecraft are ‘illegal’ in Stop Killing Games hearing

A new hearing for California’s Protect Our Games Act took place this week, and once again, the Entertainment Software Association (ESA) pushed back hard against the Stop Killing Games movement. The bill aims to require publishers to provide a way for players to continue accessing games after online services are discontinued. While technically feasible in many cases, major publishers have consistently resisted the idea, preferring to shut games down entirely rather than relinquish control.