Home / Tech News / Featured Tech News / ASRock Fatal1ty Z270 Gaming K6 Motherboard Review

ASRock Fatal1ty Z270 Gaming K6 Motherboard Review

Automatic CPU Overclocking:

ASrock includes CPU overclocking presets for 4.6GHz, 4.7GHz, 4.8GHz, 4.9GHz, and 5.0GHz. 4.6GHz uses a 1.35V CPU VCore and no AVX offset. 4.8GHz uses a 1.380V VCore and a -2x multiplier AVX offset. 5.0GHz uses a very high 1.45V CPU VCore and a -3x multiplier AVX offset.

4_8-turbo-preset-avx

4_8-1 4_8-2 4_8-3

We tested stability with the 4.8GHz preset and found it to be solid. A good cooler will be required to manage the 1.38V CPU VCore. As the screenshot shows, Prime 95 AVX workload drops the CPU clock speed by two multipliers down to 4.6GHz.

I am pleased to see that XMP is left enabled with the CPU overclocking presets.

Manual CPU Overclocking:

To test the ASRock Fatal1ty Z270 Gaming K6 motherboard’s CPU overclocking potential, we first increased the CPU VCore to 1.35V and applied Level 1 LLC setting in order to minimise voltage adjustments above or below the desired level.

We maintained the DRAM frequency at 3200MHz to take its stability out of the overclocking equation. Cache frequency was manually set at its stock MCT value of 4.2GHz as the ASRock board had a tendency to increase the cache speed to 4.6GHz or 4.8GHz when the Auto setting was applied.

4_8-1_35-l1-llc-load

We took our 7700K to its Prime-stable maximum frequency of 4.8GHz. This used a 1.35V BIOS-set VCore and the Level 1 LLC mode which saw the CPU VCore drop by only 6mV under heavy load. This level of voltage accuracy is superb.

3600MHz XMP Memory:

We test the motherboard's ability to run G.Skill's high-speed 16GB DDR4 TridentZ kit at a 3600MHz XMP setting. High-speed XMP settings can prove a challenge for motherboard designers when optimising the settings for stability at the intended DRAM frequency.

3600-xmp-load

Overclocked Performance

As a performance comparison, we have included the results from two other Z270 motherboards. The maximum overclocked configuration achieved with each board was a 4800MHz (48 x 100MHz) processor frequency whilst using 3200MHz CL14 memory.

oc-cine

oc-3dm

oc-ashes

oc-gta-v

After being overclocked to 4.8GHz, ASRock's Fatal1ty Z270 Gaming K6 maintains its top spot in CPU-heavy benchmarks and manages to gain the first position in gaming tests.

Power

We leave the system to idle on the Windows 10 desktop for 5 minutes before taking a reading. For CPU load results we run AIDA64 CPU, FPU, and Cache stress tests and take a reading. The power consumption of our entire test system (at the wall) is shown in the chart.

power

The 1.232V Stock MCT VCore results in positive power draw numbers for ASRock. A load system-wide power draw of 124W shows good efficiency and is only bested by ASUS' STRIX Z270F Gaming. Idle numbers are also positive thanks to the ability of ASRock's hybrid digital controller to drop the CPU core voltage under low-load conditions.

Overclocked power draw is the worst of these three contenders, likely due to ASRock's ability to hold close to 1.35V (unlike Gigabyte's) while also powering add-on chipsets for USB 3.0 and SATA (unlike ASUS). Put simply, the Z270 Gaming K6 is likely to draw a little more power from your system than ASUS' STRIX Z270F Gaming, even when both use the same BIOS-set CPU VCore levels.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

DLSS 5 NVIDIA

KitGuru Games: DLSS 5 misses the point

It would be hard to argue that NVIDIA’s DLSS technologies haven’t been a net positive to the PC space, with the machine-learning based upscaler successfully translating lower resolution inputs into a final image which is perceivably sharper while hogging fewer resources. Though somewhat more contentious, the next evolution of DLSS came in the form of Frame Generation, using ML in order to generate additional frames for high-refresh rate gaming. Both techniques can have their issues, but generally speaking they’ve allowed for more people to experience higher-end titles at increased frame rates. DLSS 5, however, takes a sharp pivot, with a very different end goal in mind than the performance-boosting versions that came before.

2 comments

  1. Wolfgang Christl

    Good board! Looking to buy this one or the xtreme! any reviews soon?

  2. The Fatal1ty is superior… but you cannot go wrong with either of them 😉