Home / Professional / Design & Create / AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 Professional Graphics Card Review

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 Professional Graphics Card Review

CINEBENCH 15 is a cross-platform testing suite that measures hardware performance and is the de facto standard benchmarking tool for leading companies and trade journals for conducting real-world hardware performance tests. With the new Release 15, systems with up to 256 threads can be tested.

CINEBENCH is available for both Windows and OS X and is used by almost all hardware manufacturers and trade journals for comparing CPUs and graphics cards. We only ran the Open GL portion of the test, as graphics power has no effect on rendering performance.

The WX 8200 is only slightly behind the WX 9100 in the Cinebench OpenGL viewport test. However, the Quadro P4000 is 12 per cent faster, and the more expensive Quadros go upwards from here.

So if you're running Maxon Cinebench for modelling, the Quadro P4000 just shades it despite the higher price. Note that in these tests the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 was tested on a slightly different platform, which may have given it a slightly lower score than it would have on the main test platform.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

DLSS 5 NVIDIA

KitGuru Games: DLSS 5 misses the point

It would be hard to argue that NVIDIA’s DLSS technologies haven’t been a net positive to the PC space, with the machine-learning based upscaler successfully translating lower resolution inputs into a final image which is perceivably sharper while hogging fewer resources. Though somewhat more contentious, the next evolution of DLSS came in the form of Frame Generation, using ML in order to generate additional frames for high-refresh rate gaming. Both techniques can have their issues, but generally speaking they’ve allowed for more people to experience higher-end titles at increased frame rates. DLSS 5, however, takes a sharp pivot, with a very different end goal in mind than the performance-boosting versions that came before.