Home / PC / Base Unit / Intel NUC 9 Extreme (Ghost Canyon) Review

Intel NUC 9 Extreme (Ghost Canyon) Review

We are comparing the NUC 9 Extreme Ghost Canyon against a pair of high-powered laptops that Leo reviewed recently.

The base Core i9-9980HK-powered NUC9i9QNX version of the NUC 9 Extreme Ghost Canyon that we are using retails for £1,640 including VAT in the UK, albeit with a free 8GB RAM kit and 128GB M.2 SATA SSD (which realistically are of minimal value).

Beef it up to our configuration with 16GB of DDR4, a 1TB Kingston KC2000 M.2 PCIe SSD, and the ASUS Dual RTX 2070 Mini graphics card and the all-in price is around £650 higher at about £2300. Once you add in the 380GB Intel Optane 905p M.2 SSD that our test unit ships with, that adds another £500(!) onto the cost. That’s around £2800 all-in for our unit, excluding the cost of a Windows license, of course.

Intel NUC 9 Extreme (NUC9i9QNX) Test Configuration:

  • Processor: Intel Core i9-9980HK (65W long duration power limit, 107W short duration power limit, 28.00 TAU).
  • Memory: 16GB (2x8GB) Kingston HyperX SO-DIMM DDR4-2666MHz.
  • Graphics Card: ASUS Dual RTX 2070 Mini 8GB.
  • System Drive: Intel SSD 905p Optane 380GB M.2 SSD.
  • Secondary SSD: Kingston KC2000 PCIe NVMe 1TB.
  • CPU Cooler: Intel Compute Element default 80mm fan and vapour chamber (‘Cool' UEFI fan settings).
  • Power Supply: FSP FSP500-30AS 80-Plus Platinum Flex-ATX 500W.
  • Chassis: Intel NUC 9 Extreme NUC9i9QNX chassis (‘Cool' UEFI fan settings).
  • Operating System: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit.

Comparison Systems:

Tests

  • Cinebench R15 – All-core & single-core CPU benchmark (CPU), Stress test (Temperatures & Power Consumption)
  • Cinebench R20 – All-core CPU testing (CPU)
  • Blender 2.82a – All-core rendering of the BMW (CPU), Stress test (Temperatures & Power Consumption)
  • SiSoft Sandra – Memory bandwidth (Memory)
  • AIDA64 – Memory bandwidth, memory latency (Memory)
  • 3DMark – Fire Strike (1080p) test, Time Spy (1440p) test (Gaming)
  • F1 2019 – 1920 x 1080, 2560 x 1440, Ultra High quality preset, DX12 (Gaming)
  • Red Dead Redemption 2 – 1920 x 1080, 2560 x 1440, High settings manually applied, DX12 (Gaming)
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider – 1920 x 1080, 2560 x 1440, Highest quality preset, no AA, DX12 version (Gaming)
  • The Division 2 – 1920 x 1080, 2560 x 1440, Ultra quality preset, no AA, DX12 version (Gaming)

Become a Patron!

Check Also

DLSS 5 NVIDIA

KitGuru Games: DLSS 5 misses the point

It would be hard to argue that NVIDIA’s DLSS technologies haven’t been a net positive to the PC space, with the machine-learning based upscaler successfully translating lower resolution inputs into a final image which is perceivably sharper while hogging fewer resources. Though somewhat more contentious, the next evolution of DLSS came in the form of Frame Generation, using ML in order to generate additional frames for high-refresh rate gaming. Both techniques can have their issues, but generally speaking they’ve allowed for more people to experience higher-end titles at increased frame rates. DLSS 5, however, takes a sharp pivot, with a very different end goal in mind than the performance-boosting versions that came before.