Home / Tech News / Featured Announcement / G.Skill Ripjaws4 2400MHz 32GB DDR4 Memory Kit Review

G.Skill Ripjaws4 2400MHz 32GB DDR4 Memory Kit Review

We test the memory kit’s performance at the 2666MHz (100MHz BCLK) overclocked settings. The stock speed results are graphed to show the performance gains (if any) that are obtained from overclocking.

OC bandwidth-

OC latency_

OC Bioshock

A simple 266MHz DRAM frequency increase adds around 8% to the memory bandwidth numbers. 4.6ns (around 7%) is shaved off the memory latency thanks to the faster clock rate.

Albeit a minute tenth of a frame (around 0.1%) increase in Bioshock Infinite performance, 2666MHz with CL15 timings running off the 100MHz BCLK seems to be a sweet-spot for all-round memory performance. Games which utilise system memory to a greater extent may show heavier performance increases from the higher clock rate.

Users with memory-intensive workloads can benefit from the free performance boosts that require little more than a few voltage increases.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

KitGuru is hiring – come and join our YouTube reviews team!

Our YouTube channel has grown a lot in recent years and we are looking to grow things further with more reviews. If you have ever fancied reviewing tech and breaking into the content creation space, then we have a job opening for you! 

4 comments

  1. Calvin Summerlin

    This kit uses Samsung ICs as evidenced by the “3500” in the serial numbers. Hynix would be “3400” and Micron “3300” for G.Skill DDR4. Probably the initial batches were all Hynix but these days it seems for all the RAM vendors that Hynix ICs are being reserved for high end kits with specs that only Hynix can pass (3000MHz 15-15-15, 3200MHz 16-16-16 etc).

    No votes yet.
  2. Thanks for that information, Calvin. Where did you find the info?

    Luke

    No votes yet.
  3. Calvin Summerlin

    Long thread over at XtremeSystems forums: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?283666-Figuring-out-G-Skill-s-SNs

    No votes yet.
  4. Thanks for that! I have updated the text in the article and thanked you for the information.

    Luke

    No votes yet.