Home / Tech News / Featured Tech Reviews / DinoPC Primal GT0 System Review (FX8320/RX480)

DinoPC Primal GT0 System Review (FX8320/RX480)

SiSoftware Sandra (the System ANalyser, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant) is an information & diagnostic utility. It should provide most of the information (including undocumented) you need to know about your hardware, software and other devices whether hardware or software.

Sandra is a (girls’) name of Greek origin that means “defender”, “helper of mankind”. We think that’s quite fitting.

It works along the lines of other Windows utilities, however it tries to go beyond them and show you more of what’s really going on. Giving the user the ability to draw comparisons at both a high and low-level. You can get information about the CPU, chipset, video adapter, ports, printers, sound card, memory, network, Windows internals, AGP, PCI, PCI-X, PCIe (PCI Express), database, USB, USB2, 1394/Firewire, etc.

Native ports for all major operating systems are available:

  • Windows XP, 2003/R2, Vista, 7, 2008/R2 (x86)
  • Windows XP, 2003/R2, Vista, 7, 2008/R2 (x64)
  • Windows 2003/R2, 2008/R2* (IA64)
  • Windows Mobile 5.x (ARM CE 5.01)
  • Windows Mobile 6.x (ARM CE 5.02)

All major technologies are supported and taken advantage of:

  • SMP – Multi-Processor
  • MC – Multi-Core
  • SMT/HT – Hyper-Threading
  • MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AVX, FMA – Multi-Media instructions
  • GPGPU, DirectX, OpenGL – Graphics
  • NUMA – Non-Uniform Memory Access
  • AMD64/EM64T/x64 – 64-bit extensions to x86
  • IA64 – Intel* Itanium 64-bit

arithmetic

arithmetic

memory

memory-bandwidth

The FX-8320 and 990X chipset show their age a bit here. The CPU falls behind in the Sandra arithmetic test, with the Intel Core i5-6500 from UK Gaming Computers' Styx ahead of it.

Memory bandwidth is below the levels of the Styx, too – despite both RAM kits being clocked at 2133MHz, as well as the the GT0 having 16GB when the Styx has 8GB of DDR3.

Not the best start for the GT0 – but this is merely one synthetic test of many real-world and synthetic benchmarks we have ahead, so let us march on.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

DLSS 5 NVIDIA

KitGuru Games: DLSS 5 misses the point

It would be hard to argue that NVIDIA’s DLSS technologies haven’t been a net positive to the PC space, with the machine-learning based upscaler successfully translating lower resolution inputs into a final image which is perceivably sharper while hogging fewer resources. Though somewhat more contentious, the next evolution of DLSS came in the form of Frame Generation, using ML in order to generate additional frames for high-refresh rate gaming. Both techniques can have their issues, but generally speaking they’ve allowed for more people to experience higher-end titles at increased frame rates. DLSS 5, however, takes a sharp pivot, with a very different end goal in mind than the performance-boosting versions that came before.

4 comments

  1. Why are there no FPS results shown for the other systems?

  2. MetalQuintessence

    I know FX-8320 is kinda dated cpu and architecture, but that idle load power is way off the normal scale, usually these cpu’s idle at less than 100W total system draw.

    Also the GTAV results seem weird as fuck, I’ve seen even FX-6300 get better FPS than that, let alone any of the 8 core FX cpus. So may that was a faulty unit?

  3. I currently make about $6000-$8000 monthly with an online job. Those who are willing to work basic computer-based work for 2-5 hours every day at your home and earn valuable payment for doing it… Then this work opportunity is for you… SELF97.COM

    sadsrfr

  4. Hmm https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SmyaK7xqGMQ