Last updated on June 30th, 2019 at 09:44 am
We have recently revamped our GPU power consumption testing. Previously we would measure the total system power draw with each graphics card installed. Given that the rest of the components did not change, this gave us an idea of the relative power consumption of each graphics card, but we could not be more specific than that.
Now, however, thanks to Cybenetics Labs and its Powenetics Project, we are able to measure the power consumption of the graphics card alone, giving much more precise and accurate data. Essentially, this works by installing sensors in the PCIe power cables, as well as the PCIe slot itself thanks to a special riser card. This data is recorded using specialist software provided by Cybenetics Labs and given it polls multiple times a second (between 6 and 8 times a second, based on my observations) we can track the power consumption in incredible detail over any given amount of time.
You can read more about the Powenetics Project over HERE.
Note: if the above images are not displaying properly, you may need to disable your ad block software as they are known to interfere with our display code.
As with previous testing, a reading under load comes from running the 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra stress test 20 times. An idle reading comes after leaving the system on the Windows desktop for 30 minutes. This stress test (20 runs) produces approximately 4300 data entries in the Powenetics software, which we can then export to an Excel file and analyse further. Here we present the average continuous power consumption of each graphics card across the entire 20 run test.
With a reference-speed RTX 2060 rated at 160W – which is exactly what we saw from our Founders Edition sample – it is no surprise to see this factory overclocked card draw just under 200W when under load. It is interesting to see this MSI actually draw more power than the Strix 2060, though, as the latter card has a higher clock speed, so I would have expected that Strix to draw slightly more power. The difference is only 5.7W at most, though, so it is not exactly a big variation.