Home / Tech News / Featured Tech Reviews / AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB Review

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB Review

We measure the amount of power drawn from the wall by the entire test system. Our Core i7-5960X CPU is heavily overclocked and has a large bearing on the power draw readings when it is heavily loaded in GTA V (our chosen game for system readings). The important information is the difference in power draw levels between each card.

power

The GTX 980 is a 165 TDP part and AMD's R9 Nano is a 175W TDP card. So it comes as little surprise that overall system power consumption is just under 10W more than that of a GTX 980, albeit a factory overclocked one.

AMD has done a very good job at constricting the power usage of the R9 Nano. We cannot accurately validate AMD's claims that the R9 Nano is utilising the ‘efficient' range of the Fiji GPU, but power draw numbers compared to a R9 Fury X would suggest that is indeed the case.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Cougar MX600 Max RGB Case Review

Cougar has a new high airflow contender, but can it compete with the big names?

12 comments

  1. Price!! AMD… I know it’s unique but you had a good opportunity to fight NVIDIA but you priced yourself too high (again).

    No votes yet.
  2. And with their yield issues it will be priced even higher at retailers lol.

    No votes yet.
  3. Who are you kidding?

    No votes yet.
  4. I can’t see how they can charge the same as a Fury X and the Fury X has the added cost of watercooling.

    No votes yet.
  5. Don’t matter on price, Gaming enthusiast’s will buy it just because of the size and performance it give’s, If people are willing to spend like 1500 for a titan X, I’m sure people will pay 1/3 of the price for the nano.

    No votes yet.
  6. Can you cram Fury x into SFF case?

    No votes yet.
  7. ^ This, it delivers very well for the size/form factor in spades. But if anyone has the space/non ITX case to house longer cards the Nano isn’t for them, people just need to realize this and move on.

    No votes yet.
  8. yes. Read a review somewhere (Hexus?) where they mentioned you could cram a Fury X into some mITX cases 🙂

    Most mITX cases are long, to incorporate a full sized GFX card, you can for example get a Strix 980 into a Fractal Node 304. It’s only when you get down to stuff like the Coolermaster Elite 110 that an mITX card becomes necessary.

    No votes yet.
  9. For £515 you can buy a 980Ti, unless you really needed a smaller card why would you purchase this ?

    No votes yet.
  10. Indeed. Most of the people complaining about the niche this card lives in wouldn’t be buying one anyway, they’re just more interested in complaining about it.

    No votes yet.
  11. Most of the complaining is from nvidia fanboys, trolls or paid shills. There is no way a sane consumer can be totally blind to the value proposition this card gives in ultra SFF compared to useless value the titan X gives when it is so overpriced for any form factor.

    Of course there are some legitimate voices of dissatisfaction among those who really wanted to buy this card thinking it will be a more cut down version of Fiji chip and could be had for like 400-450 USD, those people have legit reasons to be slightly miffed but given the performance this thing shows they will quickly realize this card isn’t for them, the $549 R9 Fury is.

    No votes yet.
  12. I would buy it with no hessitation, and I’m a full tower user.

    No votes yet.